It seems weird to make a big deal about your manual being written by an award winning game designer when he had nothing to do with the game itself. |
Having said that, I enjoyed the game a lot more at the beginning. I was wondering if it was just that the humour got stale after a while, but I really think it's more because much more effort was put into the beginning of the game than the late game. More items seem to have unique and detailed descriptions earlier whereas later in the game there are a lot more generic or shorter responses.
Puzzles and Solvability
The puzzles in this game are fine. They're mostly inventory based.
There is one area on the surface that I can't get through because I'm a man. One of the first things I did after changing my gender was to go past that area, wondering what excitement I'd find beyond.
Well, I found some more huts just like the one on the screen before, a chicken roasting over a fire, and a stream that I can't cross because of the piranhas. I spent much of the rest of the game wondering how I would get past the piranhas and what I'd find beyond it. Then the game ended. The only reason to go to the surface as a woman was to get a roast chicken that wasn't useful until the very last section of the game. Thinking about it now it's rather baffling. The piranha stream wasn't the only red herring in the game. There are a lot of items that serve no purpose whatsoever, and don't even have interesting comments when interacted with (but I'll get to that later)
I feel that they had planned a much larger game but ran out of time or money. Some of the things that make me think so are the above section, and also the software store that is only useful for getting penlight batteries but contains a security system and various types of software. I felt sure I'd have to either get an item through the security system of the software store or take parts of the security system to trick someone else at some point. More puzzling possibilities that are strangely not there.
Seriously. With the security stands at the front, and the software on the special stand in the middle, how can the small penlight on the shelf be the ONLY interactive element in the entire store. |
The one positive in the puzzles and solvability section is the lack of negatives. Mazes, bad mini-games, and timed sequences don't exist. The manual hinted that hard mode could have dead-ends, but I didn't find any, and wouldn't blame a game for including them if they also included difficulty levels that don't have any dead-ends, so another good here.
The difficulty levels are quite a positive, or at least could have been. Difficulty levels can really help a game by making it easier or harder depending on each player's wishes. I did solve one puzzle by spoiling myself in easy mode, but when I redid the first half of the game in medium difficulty I was surprised at the limited amount of times it was used. Using it for more than a handful of puzzles is something else I felt was a good idea but largely ignored in development.
Overall, I wasn't terribly impressed with the puzzles in general in this game. So a slightly below par 4 seems appropriate.
Final score: 4
Interface and Inventory
The interface has some nice ease-of-use features. Holding down the mouse button acts as a “What is” or tooltip option so you don't get stuck pixel hunting. I appreciated that.
I was annoyed that the game never made it clear that the explosives couldn't be used without a detonator. I wasted a lot of time attempting to blow things up – the game even made of point of me having to be careful with it, reminding me about Professor Pyro blowing herself up whenever I looked at them. Come on game, if the cases won't blow up without detonators, you could have told me that every time I try to throw them or put them on something.
Each inventory item had a funny (potentially) description, and at least one special action. Some of the actions are obvious, like 'read' for the repair list and most were there for a single joke, like 'fondle'. The spinning inventory, which was so exciting it was touted as a feature in the manual, isn't terribly exciting but does add some movement to a section of the screen that would otherwise be static, so well done, I guess? The downside is that the section becomes very drab and grey. I assume the spinning meant they couldn't also do much with colour, because all items are just light shades of grey over a darker grey background.
Grey chicken looks much less appetizing than brown chicken. |
Final score: 5
Story and Setting
The background story of a gender war was interesting, as long as I didn't think too much about the logistics of it, but of course most comedy game stories fall apart if you try to think about them logically. Machopolis was by far the most fleshed out setting in the game.
In fact, the post-apocalyptic style setting of Machopolis is a weird contrast to the attempted tone of the game as a whole. The game descriptions are full of jokes and it's clear the game doesn't want me to take it seriously, but the empty husk of a city that was Machopolis on its own is rarely funny at all. I'm not sure I'd call it bad but... it's just very strange, and didn't click with me.
I'm a fan of the Fallout series and that's something that has a largely serious post-apocalyptic setting that also manages to do plenty of silly comedy and have the two mesh very well. So it can be done, but this game just didn't succeed as well.
- Is he clumsy? Well yes, but I only found that out in the ending cutscene, when he knocks over the vase.
- Is he unlucky in love? It seems so, due largely to his stereotypical single-bachelor style living conditions, but it's not something that defines him like Larry Laffer.
- Is he competent? I'm really not sure - I suppose so but how much of that was just me successfully solving puzzles rather than part of his personality?
Perhaps Rex's personality would have made more of an impact on me if he was the one narrating rather than a separate narrator |
Final score: 4
Sound and Graphics
The game surprised me by only having talking during the opening cutscene. Even the end cutscene, with Rex and Stone, where Rex knocks over the vase after they have a two-line conversation doesn't have speech – strange choice.
Anyway, the sound in this game was... not good. Gee, in coming up with these ratings I've been a lot harsher than I expected. And listening to some of the sounds again, it's really years behind the times.The dog sounds nothing like a dog. Even the gender bender machine itself sounds like it could be made with PC Speaker in the 80s. (I'm possibly slightly exaggerating the quality of 1980s PC Speaker sounds, but it's certainly not actually good.)
Well, at least we know who to blame for the dog sounding so bad. |
As for the graphics, they're acceptable and things look like what they are supposed to look like. The animation I spoke so well of in the introduction post was indeed only an indication of the opening cutscene quality.
I'm once again going for a 4 in this section. It's not quite okay.
Final score: 4
Environment and Atmosphere
This is always a hard one to rate. I suppose it can be defined as the feel of the game. How do all the facets of the game combine to make a cohesive and fun experience.
Ah, the times when I had a much higher impression of the game. |
A mediocre game deserves a mediocre score. I'll go with a 5 here.
Final score: 5
Dialogue and Acting
After the first section I played, I was impressed with the writing, and the acting of the opening cutscene.
But the more I played the less impressed I became. The verbose funny responses to things are largely the same. Trying to look at something the first time gives me a funny response. Looking at the eleventh item on a screen that gives the same funny response as the previous ten quickly makes the response lose its humour.
This is one of 11 items on this screen alone that has the exact same description when looked at. |
Possibly the best writing was actually in the confusingly named Audio Log that came with the game documentation and was written by Steve Meretzky. The Audio Log is a 23 page booklet and contained a rather funny text version of an audio-captured Captain's Log.
The Audio Log ends in the middle of the opening cutscene! |
Final Rating: 5
Final Rating
This gives us a Final rating of… 4+5+4+4+5+5*10/6, which equals…
And to give an indication of my Overall Fun Factor, I found that thinking more on the game for the purpose of rating it actually made me think less of the game. I don't think that's happened to me before. There must have been something about the game that kept it interesting enough not to notice its flaws as I played. Having played this game once, I can't see myself ever wanting to play it again – I enjoyed Space Quest IV and even Leather Goddesses of Phobos 2 more than this game and really can't see myself playing this game again. Sorry, Rex. I'll give the game a 4 out of 10 for Overall Fun Factor, which gives a PISSEDOFF rating of... 4+5+4+4+5+5+4+4+4/.9 which equals 43!
100 CAPs to TBD
- Blogger Award - 100 CAPs - For playing Rex Nebular and the Cosmic Gender Bender for everyone's enjoyment
- Bad Motivator Award - 5 CAPs - for letting Charles know that the vase is entirely uninteresting as a motivation
- True Companion Award - 20 CAPs - for playing along and sharing thoughts on the game
- Assistance Confirmed Award - 6 CAPs - for giving me confirmation that I'd need Charles' help, and some extra help that I didn't end up needing
- Underused Award - 5 CAPs - for noticing and lamenting the lack of puzzles related to the Gender Bender
- Assistance Granted Award - 10 CAPs - for helping when I was stuck for a second time soon after the first
- In Conclusion Award - 6 CAPs - for a nice series of random comments on the Won! Post that I must have agreed with, seeing as many of those comments were echoed in this final rating.
- Assistance Dog Award - 10 CAPs – for helping me when I was throwing the bone at the wrong thing
- Observation Award - 5 CAPs - for further pointing out that my not noticing the hermit alley just meant I wasn't paying attention at all.
- Psychic Prediction Award – 10 CAPs – for correctly guessing the PISSED Rating Rex Nebular would get.
- Pantene Award – 5 CAPs - for Noticing how full-bodied and 80s Rox's hair is
- Underused Award - 5 CAPs - for noticing and lamenting that the Gender Bender appears to be just a keycard
- Patron of the Arts Award - 10 CAPs - for donating to Tony Longworth, a musician who's done Infocom-inspired music on The Adventure Gamer's behalf
- Snoo-Snoo Award – 5 Caps – for putting an extremely appropriate Futurama reference in the comments
- Fine Art Award - 5 CAPs - for telling us a little about the late Kenn Nishiuye, an artist for this game who also worked for Sierra.
- Sorry Award - 5 CAPs - as compensation for having rose tinted memories tarnished by someone judging a 1992 game in 2019. Sorry.
Yay, my first CAPS for playing along and making contributions!!! I think you are spot on with the rating in every categorie. I experienced the game in the same way like you did. In the beginning it seems very promising, but as the game advances, that feeling starts to dwindle. I too think that the gender bender was a missed oportunity, and was expecting to walk through the base being a man to cause havoc and good jokes, but that can´t be done. And the tone of the game once you reached Machopolis, as I said in previous posts, changed from funny and tongue in cheek and becomes more grim and bleak, like if it was part of some other, but still enjoyable game. We ´ll have to wait till Phantom of the Opera to see if they improve with their second game. Great work TBD
ReplyDelete"it's the fourth 45 we've given for 1992"
ReplyDeleteActually, it' the fifth. The previous 45s were: Star Trek, Spellcasting 301, Island of Dr. Brain and Putt-Putt. I guess it's just natural that the more games published in a year, the more concentrated the scores will be around the average numbers.
Oh, and the Bad Motivator Award i beleive was for letting Zenic, not Charles, know that the vase is entirely uninteresting as a motivation.
ReplyDeleteThinking again about if Phantom of the Opera will improve the level of Microprose games, my memory says its a no no. It has a great setting, but the puzzles are awful. Maybe when if I replay along when we reach to that game i´ll change my mind. who knows...
yeahh I guesset the rating
ReplyDeleteAnd mistyped this
DeleteSnoo-Snoo Award
ReplyDeleteXD
As a kid, this game fascinated me because it was one that my friends had but I didn't have. Maybe it seemed risque, or maybe I just wanted another Space Quest, but I wanted to play this game for years. Reading your review means I no longer have to. Thanks! :)
ReplyDeleteWow, this game did not hold up even a tiny bit, I'm glad I didn't get very far. I'm preemptively predicting a 47 for Phantom of the Opera. I've never played it but I like to hope that Microprose got it together for their second point and click adventure.
ReplyDeleteThis certainly wouldn't help the score, but I don't remember this being pointed out -- this game came out during the transition from floppies to CDs for adventure games, and this game was released on 9 floppy disks. The fact that they released this as a floppy game might have driven the decision to use less speech and other enhancements.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if maybe, at the beginning of development, they might have planned the outline for a CD and then, budget cuts made it a floppy release. It could explain the rooms that weren't expanded properly.