Jinkies! How will we solve this mystery? |
Right off the bat, I’m not sure how to report on this game. Mystery games aren’t always linear and viewing the same scene eight times from different angles might not make for entertaining reading. Since I know nothing about this game, I’m just going to write it as I go and if we need to adjust the format down the road then so be it.
Our first action should be to explore the murder scene and there is quite a bit to see. There are some signs of a struggle, a smashed ashtray and overturned furniture. The game cheekily tells me that the ashtray contains "not a shred of evidence", but there are some things in the room that I can explore further. The roll-top desk is locked, but there's no key nearby. That might be important later. There's also a shark-teeth plaque on the wall that I can just about remove, if I only had a way to pull out a nail. Why would I want to do that? I have no idea. There’s also an empty trunk, a painting leaning against the wall, and more books than I care to read.
These books are not suspicious in any way. |
Just for giggles, I run these letters (and one more) through an anagram solver. It finds a few possibilities for later: CLING, CLINT, and COLIN. Will any of these be the secret word? I guess we can only wait and see.
The final clue in the room required a bit of pixel-hunting: a balled up piece of paper near the ashtray. Perhaps it came out of the wastebasket? It's a note, signed by a mysterious "F", “We must resolve this problem. Meet me tonight, 8PM at the bar. It’s a matter of life or death.” I have no idea who that can be yet, but I'll look out for any Freds, Franks, or Francises in this game. As soon as I finish reading, a clock appears and time advances. It's now 8:10 AM. With nothing left to explore here, I head out into the hallway and further adventure.
I’m not sure if you’re into textual masochism, but I’m certain that you don’t want me describing in detail everything I clicked on in every room. Let’s just say that Raoul needs to find a lot of pixels to explore everything clickable in his search for clues. I’m going to fast-forward through describing to give you an overview of the ship and what I found there. Just keep in mind, for every object that I mention, there are many more that might be pertinent later. There are a LOT of things to click on!
I’m a map! |
That door is not suspicious in any way. |
What do you think is in the hold? One of the commenters last week thought this game would involve smuggling, but I'm not so sure. I suspect that a smuggler wouldn't be quite as obvious about it.
High tech for the 1920s? |
But if we needed a motive for killing Niklos, I think we found one: adjacent to the engine room is the butler’s cabin. The door is locked, but can you imagine sleeping next to the engine all night, every night that you were aboard the ship? It’s enough to make you kill a man. See? I told you the butler did it.
Second Deck
My sentiments exactly. |
Heading up the stairs, we find someone cleaning the floors. It’s our first NPC! Let’s interrogate him! Unfortunately, all we seem to be able to find out is that he’s the “ship’s boy” and doesn’t speak English. Much of the rest of this deck appears to be service-related as I find a laundry room with a washerwoman that won’t speak to me, as well as a kitchen where a cook won’t speak to me. At least the washerwoman let's me snoop around, the cook won't even let me in the kitchen.
Does this game seem at all "classist" to you? This is a murder investigation, but Raoul doesn't treat any of the servants as suspects or witnesses. The downtrodden masses could not possibly have a motive to kill a wealthy businessman… in the 1920s.
I play this game for the articles. |
“A medium dry martini, lemon peel. Shaken, not stirred.” - Some other guy |
Another strange thing about this room is a persistent hint from the game that maybe you should steal one of the lamps off the table, but do it when there are no witnesses. Will I need to enter a dark room later and need a light? Maybe! The bartender will have to go on a lunch break or something later, right? I can also “sound” (that's the verb that appears in the list) the counter and the game replies that I need a chair. That's great, but I have no idea what Raoul is doing that needs a chair. How do you "sound" something? I look it up in the dictionary, but no dice. I suppose I’ll work it out when I find a chair to stand on, but the translation seems a bit rough in spots.
You seem awfully calm with a murderer on the loose... |
The dialog view. |
Third Deck
Sunlight and different camera angles! |
The next deck switches up the claustrophobia of ship interiors to more open outdoor spaces, including new camera angles. It’s actually quite nice to have some brighter colors and less boxy room designs. There are the usual array of things to interact with outside, including a locked storage bin, a padlocked hatch that leads down into the kitchen, a container of tangled fishing nets, two lifeboats, and more. Just like below, you can click on and interact with every rope, every light, and everything else so there’s quite a lot to see.
This deck is primarily the passenger cabins and we find Raoul’s first, but there’s not much of interest inside. He shares it with someone names Julio Esperanza, but he must be hanging out elsewhere. Julio must be a fine dresser because he’s brought several different colored hats to wear on the cruise. The next room is the the bathroom and there is a bar of soap on the sink that we can pick up-- our first inventory item! I wonder what devious adventure game puzzle will require a bar of soap. (On second thought, we did pick up a note in Niklos's office. So this is really my second inventory item.)
Because she’s dead. Or naked. Not sure which. |
Top Deck
No land in sight. Where are we going, anyway? |
My tour of the ship ends on the scenic top deck where Suzanne, a friend of the family, stares off into the sea and apparently is not at all concerned about a murderer running. She tells me that Julio is a playboy with a wealthy family and many fancy cars, that Daphne was “cold-blooded” when she learned of her father’s death, and that Tom is not a “straightforward person”. She also doesn’t have an alibi during the mysterious bar meeting as she was asleep at the time. (At 8 PM? That seems early.) I don’t learn much, but I must be going in the right direction because the time is now 8:50 AM.
That completes a full circuit of the ship, but there is still plenty to go:
- I have spoken to Tom (the solicitor), Julio (Daphne’s special friend), and Suzanne (a friend of the family). The map tells me that I have yet to find Rebecca, Daphne, Father Fabiani, Dick, Rose, or Captain Simon. I also do not know where the suspicious butler has gotten off to.
- Just about half the rooms on the ship are still unavailable to me; I hope I find a key or something soon.
The graphics in this game are okay, but there is a bit of a disconnect between the hand-painted backgrounds and the rotoscoped human characters. Delphine pretty much mastered the rotoscope in computer games when they made Another World, so it’s nice to see that aspect reproduced here, but I’m not sure it integrates as well. (Or more likely, I have rose-tinted memories of that game.) The translation is dodgy with many examples in every room of words that just seem to be “off”, but you get used to it pretty quickly.
All in all, I’m enjoying it so far, but I am eager to explore the rest of the ship and start solving some of the mysteries. Next week, I hope someone starts acting like there's a murderer on the loose. I'll also take a closer look at the dialog system as that seems to be the most important new mechanic in this game.
Time played: 3 hr 15 min
Total time: 3 hr 15 min
Inventory: Piece of paper, Soap
Deaths / Reloads:
2 restarts due to game crashes
0 deaths
Having played through this since last week (with, I admit up front, some walkthrough assistance) I'm greatly looking forward to the rest of the chronicle.
ReplyDeleteWhile much of the game has, IMHO, music ranging from decent to good - I especially like the track playing during the intro - I grew to absolutely loathe the Looney Tunes-esque track that plays in the bar.
Which version did you play? I am not sure if the Amiga and DOS versions have the same music. Thus far, I'm not enjoying it as much and there are a lot of areas with no background music.
DeleteDOS. Thinking back, the tracks I enjoyed more show up later in the game, when there is more happening. You're correct that a lot of areas have no music especially early on - it generally only kicks in when there's another person around.
Delete> "The graphics in this game are okay, but there is a bit of a disconnect between the hand-painted backgrounds and the rotoscoped human characters. Delphine pretty much mastered the rotoscope in computer games when they made Another World, so it’s nice to see that aspect reproduced here, but I’m not sure it integrates as well."
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure you're aware of this but when the game was first introduced to the press, it had and drawn graphics, not 3D characters. I'm not sure why it was changed but I guess that people at Delphine were impressed by the work of Chahi on Another World. At least in the company, as I'm not sure AW had already been released when Cruise went tout. Not sure either if it was AW's engine that was used for Cruise.
The first version was also very different, with small sprites (similar in size to the characters in Future Wars) and colorful graphics.
I don't think you'll find a lot of pictures of these versions on the web but you can check scans from a french magazine here:
- http://download.abandonware.org/magazines/Tilt/tilt_numero076/TILT%20076%20-%20Page%20013%20%281990-03%29.JPG (first version, very different from the released game)
- http://download.abandonware.org/magazines/Tilt/tilt_numero084/TILT%20084%20%28Decembre%201990%29%20Page%20017.jpg (almost final version, with finished backgrounds but characters still hand drawn)
How do you "sound" something? I look it up in the dictionary, but no dice.
ReplyDeleteYou'll want to have Google Safesearch firmly in place before you explore that question any further.
OH DEAR GOD.
DeleteAn anonymous commenter posted this but it seems that blogger ate it (or maybe he deleted it?). Either way, this is FANTASTIC information and I wanted to share it with the group:
ReplyDeleteAnonymous has left a new comment on the post "Cruise for a Corpse - A Three Hour Tour":
> "The graphics in this game are okay, but there is a bit of a disconnect between the hand-painted backgrounds and the rotoscoped human characters. Delphine pretty much mastered the rotoscope in computer games when they made Another World, so it’s nice to see that aspect reproduced here, but I’m not sure it integrates as well."
I'm not sure you're aware of this but when the game was first introduced to the press, it had and drawn graphics, not 3D characters. I'm not sure why it was changed but I guess that people at Delphine were impressed by the work of Chahi on Another World. At least in the company, as I'm not sure AW had already been released when Cruise went tout. Not sure either if it was AW's engine that was used for Cruise.
The first version was also very different, with small sprites (similar in size to the characters in Future Wars) and colorful graphics.
I don't think you'll find a lot of pictures of these versions on the web but you can check scans from a french magazine here:
- http://download.abandonware.org/magazines/Tilt/tilt_numero076/TILT%20076%20-%20Page%20013%20%281990-03%29.JPG (first version, very different from the released game)
- http://download.abandonware.org/magazines/Tilt/tilt_numero084/TILT%20084%20%28Decembre%201990%29%20Page%20017.jpg (almost final version, with finished backgrounds but characters still hand drawn)
Yeah, that was me (I also commented as anonymous on the two previous Cruise posts, about AW and Operation Stealth and such). I didn't delete the comment, I guess it was caught by Blogger for some reason (the links to the images perhaps).
Delete(Not sure how the comments from Blogger work: I've currently selected a Google account but it doesn't seem to recognize it.)
Welcome! Blogger is strange.
DeleteI actually like the hand-drawn look better. The first version about is just... strange. And does not look at all like 1925. But it has... character. The current version is lacking. Almost steampunk, with the giant telescope on the deck, but it really doesn't fit in with the characterization of the final game. I wonder how different it would be...
DeleteWhen I played the game (in 1991), I didn't mind about the difference between the 3D characters and the hand drawn backgrounds, more about the fact that the main character didn't look the same between the 3D version and the hand drawn one that you see in the cutscenes and dialogs. I was especially bothered about the hair. :)
DeleteThe "finale" hand drawn version would probably have been better looking but maybe the animations would have been too limited (these were pretty big sprites in an adventure game for that time).
The original comment had gone to Blogger's trash bin (probably because of the image links), but I managed to dig it up.
DeleteAs for the original graphics - wow! I've played the game and boy do those hand drawn images look great compared to the characters in the actual game.
CELINA, CURLIN (g), UNCLIP, PENCIL, NICKEL, NICELY... There's quite a few ways that puzzle could go from there, Joe.
ReplyDeleteYou can also 'sound' an alarm, if you want to be slightly less frightening than Rowan's urethral adventuring.
"Sound" is also a verb used for measuring the depth of something (such as the water your boat is in).
ReplyDeleteRe: the mermaid statue. There were apparently plans of some kind of hotline you could call to get help if you were stuck. The code given by the mermaid statue would be entered, and you'd be told what you needed to do next. I don't think it was ever launched.
ReplyDelete"I regret to confess that as a child of the 80s, I am awful at reading analog clocks."
ReplyDeleteWait, this is thing? That's interesting! As a child of the 80s myself, I have no issues with a analogue clocks.
It's a thing, but I wouldn't have thought it would start until much later, like people born after 2000, or maybe after 1995. Certainly I have no trouble with analog clocks and grew up in the 80s...
DeleteWell, Early '80s or late '80s? I imagine that at some point in the '80s, schools might have reduced the emphasis on teaching analog clock skills. (My son missed 3 months of second grade due to the pandemic, but I had to learn cursive in second grade, so I reckon we got about the same net education)
DeleteI've never successfully explained to a person of the digital clock generation the extent to which an analogue clock changes your perception of time - that you just don't think of time as discrete parcels with exact values as much, and view time more as a relationship of proximity between landmarks - kind of similar to the perceptual difference between the way a GPS gives directions "in two miles, turn left" and the way a human does "You'll see a red barn on your right. Turn left before you get there"
I'm in my early 40s now so you can do the math there, but I'm still no good at analog clocks. I can read them obviously, but it's a conscious effort: the big hand is on the 5 and the little hand is... Older people seem to have a more intuitive grasp of them. They read, but I sound out words.
DeleteAnd second: wow, time flies. This post was six years ago... and I still remember how little I liked it. Welcome, if you are just catching up now!
It's been a great read for a clearly not great game!
DeleteI'm an early '80s baby too. Maybe this is also country/cultural thing? I recall time-telling being one of the earliest things we learn upon starting school (UK), and I certainly had clock toys and "learning clocks" when I was little.